Viewing as:

About this Blueprint

What ORBIT demonstrates, why it exists, and what a real implementation would involve for your institution.

The problem

The regulatory expectations are universal; the tooling is not. UK PRA SS1/21, OSFI E-21, EU DORA, MAS BCM, APRA CPS 230, and the US interagency sound practices all ask essentially the same questions: which services matter, how much disruption is tolerable, what do those services actually depend on, and can you prove — under severe but plausible scenarios — that you would stay within tolerance. The enterprise platforms built to answer those questions are priced and architected for globally systemic banks. A $5–75B institution faces the same supervisory conversation with a spreadsheet estate, a multi-year vendor implementation it cannot justify, or both.

The thesis

ORBIT exists to demonstrate a third option: with AI-assisted development, an institution can build a bespoke, regulatory-aligned operational resilience capability — tailored to its own taxonomy, its own data, its own regulators — in weeks rather than years, at a small fraction of traditional cost. This is not a mockup. Everything here works: the three-lines governance workflow with immutable approved records and field-level version diffs; the dependency graph with blast-radius analysis; the material-point-of-failure methodology with elicited recovery distributions; a 10,000-iteration Monte Carlo engine that runs in your browser in under a second and reproduces to the digit from a fixed seed; and a regulatory mapping layer that speaks nine regimes’ dialects.

What it would cost — indicatively
Traditional GRC deploymentAI-assisted bespoke build
Licence & implementation$1.5–5M initial; $300–800K/yr recurringA senior team’s quarter, plus commodity hosting
Time to first value12–24 months6–12 weeks to a working, populated program
Fit to your methodologyYou adapt to the vendor’s modelThe model is yours: taxonomies, scoring, workflows are configuration
Lock-inMulti-year contracts; migration is a projectYour code, your data, portable schema (SQLite → Postgres is one line)

Indicative figures for a mid-tier institution; every situation differs. The point is the order of magnitude, not the decimals.

What a real implementation roadmap covers
  • Discovery: your service universe, regulatory footprint, and existing systems of record (CMDB, TPRM, HR) — the integration seams this prototype deliberately simulates.
  • Methodology calibration: criticality dimensions and weights, tier thresholds, tolerance-setting doctrine, and the scenario library your examiners will expect.
  • Build and data load: the platform tailored to your institution, seeded from your actual inventories rather than fictional ones.
  • Governance embedding: three-lines workflow adoption, role mapping to your SSO groups, audit and reporting cadence.
  • Testing programme: deterministic tabletop through stochastic simulation, peak-day stress, and the board self-assessment cycle.
About the author

Chitresh Sainia is a VP-level operational risk and resilience executive with 18+ years in North American banking, spanning stress testing & analytics and operational resilience at a major Canadian bank, with deep regulatory engagement across the FRB, OCC, OSFI, FDIC, and CDIC. CFA; MBA (IIM Calcutta); B.Tech (IIT Delhi). His work sits at the intersection of quantitative methods — Monte Carlo simulation, scenario analysis, CCAR/Basel frameworks — and the supervisory judgment that makes them credible to boards and examiners. ORBIT is one of a series of published blueprints on oprisk.ai demonstrating what AI-assisted development now makes possible for mid-tier institutions.

Want the roadmap for your institution?

This blueprint is the credential; the conversation is the next step. No pricing page, no signup funnel — one contact.

chitresh@oprisk.ai

Global search

Search services, processes, assets, scenarios, vulnerabilities, and regulatory provisions